Introduce software process guide - #804
Merged
Merged
Conversation
iftheshoefritz
requested review from
MalcolmTomisin,
jaredlt,
rakeshpetit,
sarahraqueld and
slickepinne
August 7, 2026 13:56
iftheshoefritz
force-pushed
the
fm-software-process-guide
branch
from
August 7, 2026 13:56
3ce2389 to
9a1152e
Compare
iftheshoefritz
commented
Aug 7, 2026
| - have a goal that is unclear or can't be evaluated | ||
| - we don't understand | ||
| - are used in the wrong context (e.g. an enterprise process in a startup) | ||
| - take time rather than making time |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this should probably be something about the time taken outweighing the benefit, or the time taken squeezing out important work
iftheshoefritz
commented
Aug 7, 2026
| - create consistency in areas that matter | ||
| - help us with tasks we don't do often | ||
|
|
||
| We disklike processes that: |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe another one could be:
- make us more reliant on someone else to complete our work
iftheshoefritz
commented
Aug 7, 2026
| @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ | |||
| # Template | |||
|
|
|||
| Software processes can be great, or they can be awful. In order to be successful at clients we often need to influence their processes. | |||
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"great" and "awful" are quite fuzzy
iftheshoefritz
force-pushed
the
fm-software-process-guide
branch
2 times, most recently
from
August 7, 2026 14:16
474f1cb to
970caf7
Compare
Thinking about influencing client software processes Co-authored-by: Jared Turner <8590311+jaredlt@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Sarah Lima <14362964+sarahraqueld@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Svenja Schäfer <19774772+slickepinne@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Rakesh Arunachalam <28998674+rakeshpetit@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tomisin Alu <41453275+MalcolmTomisin@users.noreply.github.com>
iftheshoefritz
force-pushed
the
fm-software-process-guide
branch
from
August 7, 2026 14:27
970caf7 to
3d75b5b
Compare
jutonz
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2026
jutonz
left a comment
jutonz
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nice, I like this a lot! tyvm for writing it up :)
iftheshoefritz
commented
Aug 14, 2026
iftheshoefritz
commented
Aug 14, 2026
iftheshoefritz
commented
Aug 14, 2026
iftheshoefritz
commented
Aug 14, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thinking about influencing client software processes.
Based on conversation in a Fusion workshop