replace: Should property accessors be replaced or not? #2011

• Rollup Plugin Name: @rollup/plugin-replace
• Rollup Plugin Version: 6.0.3
• Rollup Version: 4.62.0
• Operating System (or Browser): macOS 15.7.7 (local), unknown (stackblitz)
• Node Version: v22.22.3
• Link to reproduction (⚠️ read below): https://stackblitz.com/edit/rollup-repro-amxnsxzx?file=dist%2Fmain.js&view=editor

Expected Behavior

Given this test added in #1938 merged into 6.0.3:

// Should be replaced - typeof window followed by dot
if ("undefined".document !== 'undefined') {
  console.log('has document');
}

Actual Behavior

The snapshot stored by vitest does not actually replace this:

And, there is an older fixture + snapshot which directly conflicts with this interpretation, under replace-nothing:

Additional Information

The older PR which introduced the replace-nothing test was #903 which had the following comment:

Personally, I believe it's dangerous to replace VERSION in the case you highlighted by default:

if (VERSION.startsWith('foo')) {
  // things
}

In the case above with the previous default to match VERSION when used with a . or nested access, you would need to know all of your dependencies' code, not to mess up when replacing.

Originally posted by @o-alexandrov in #903 (comment)

What is the current intended behavior? I don't think these two tests can co-exist unless they're testing differently configured delimiters.