Repository navigation
Unify code-quality assessment and prepare v0.2.0 - #2
Merged
Merged
Conversation
soodoku
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 4, 2026 02:48
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The previous assessment and R pilot used separate dictionaries and aggregation paths. This change unifies them into a versioned profile of readability, maintainability, implementation reliability, reproducibility and portability, with no aggregate score.
It preserves duplication and eligibility sensitivities, adds locked lintr/flowR measurements and collection/time summaries, and separates coverage, inventory evidence and project context. Weak lexical path and trivial whitespace metrics leave the profile. Version 2 requires a fresh output directory.
Validation: 88 Python tests and formatting/lint checks pass locally and against the installed wheel. Native checks pass 31 Node tests and R adapter checks. Independent GPT-6 Astra review found no concrete defects and reproduced the checks. CI passes Python3.11 (88), Python3.14 (89) and clean native R installation; the final validation-record commit is being checked. The fixed 60-deposit comparison reproduced all 3,480 retained baseline values and denominators; it is not a population trend estimate.
Prepares exploratory v0.2.0, following the existing GitHub prerelease convention. No PyPI publication is configured. Unrelated local historical-file deletions and research notes are excluded.