Skip to content

Incrementing version for features not planned for lcm v1 - #3249

Open
MaciejKaszynski wants to merge 3 commits into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
etas-contrib:correct-lcm-req-versions
Open

MaciejKaszynski wants to merge 3 commits into
eclipse-score:mainfrom
etas-contrib:correct-lcm-req-versions

Conversation

@MaciejKaszynski

@MaciejKaszynski MaciejKaszynski commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Moving some lifecycle feature requirements to invalid See https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/2386#discussioncomment-18245891

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Documentation preview for this pull request is available at:
pr-3249: https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/pr-3249/

Comment thread docs/features/lifecycle/requirements/index.rst

@FScholPer FScholPer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please write a description and reasons. Maybe we also need a fep, I will check. I also see features which are moved to 2.0.0 which are not part of https://github.com/orgs/eclipse-score/discussions/2386?sort=new#discussioncomment-17825072

@FScholPer FScholPer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please also check the process requirements(issue related to change and so on) https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/main/platform_management_plan/change_management.html

@TimoSteuerwaldETAS TimoSteuerwaldETAS left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Maciej for updating this in accordance to our proposal from last lifecycle meeting!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Backlog
Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants