Replaced server-wide queue with asyncio#124
Merged
Merged
Conversation
MatejFrnka
changed the title
MatejFrnka
changed the title
MatejFrnka
force-pushed
the
refactor/102-use-asyncio-in-routes
branch
from
June 26, 2026 16:32
6cfc6eb to
c25f422
Compare
MatejFrnka
force-pushed
the
refactor/102-use-asyncio-in-routes
branch
from
June 30, 2026 07:46
bdbfdc8 to
438857f
Compare
MatejFrnka
commented
Jun 30, 2026
MatejFrnka
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CPU usage remained similar, RAM usage has improved slightly.
Green = original
Orange = #123
Blue = This PR
I only did one run for measuring: queue manager set to 10 parallel executions, 20 requests sent in total for each config
can do more if needed
closes #102