Ruby 4 support #55

Activity

1. dblock commented on Feb 20, 2026

   

   dblock

   on Feb 20, 2026

   Owner

   More actions

   I could, what shall we call this? I'd appreciate a PR for the change, please?
2. dblock

   added a commit that references this issue on Aug 15, 2026

   Rename Ruby::Enum to RubyEnum::Enum

   ...

   This issue will close once commit 187ab8e is merged into the 'master' branch.

   187ab8e
3. dblock commented on Aug 15, 2026

   

   dblock

   on Aug 15, 2026

   Owner

   More actions

   Please see #57.
4. dblock commented on Aug 15, 2026

   

   dblock

   on Aug 15, 2026

   Owner

   More actions

   Here's my strong opinion loosely held. Ruby 4.0 only reserves the top-level Ruby module for its own constants (Ruby::VERSION, Ruby::Box, etc.), it doesn't prevent gems from reopening/extending the module. Since we only define Ruby::Enum (not Ruby itself), there's no actual conflict, so the rename isn't necessary. If Ruby were to introduce Ruby::Enum, we would definitely rename. Closing this in the meantime.
5. dblock

   closed this as not plannedon Aug 15, 2026