[fix](test) fix regression test eliminate_inner#64457
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
Contributor
Author
|
run nonConcurrent |
1 similar comment
Contributor
Author
|
run nonConcurrent |
b92e8b0 to
adc608a
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
Contributor
|
/review |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Automated review completed for PR 64457.
No blocking issues found. The change is a narrow regression-test stabilization: eliminate_inner is a PK-FK inner-join elimination shape suite, and INFER_SET_OPERATOR_DISTINCT is an orthogonal set-operation rewrite that changes the shape of the suite's UNION DISTINCT inputs without changing the result assertions. Disabling it here keeps the suite focused on the join-elimination rule being tested.
Checkpoint conclusions:
- Goal and proof: The PR aims to stabilize/fix the
eliminate_innerregression test. The touched suite still checks bothexplain shape planand ordered query results; GitHub shows P0 Regression succeeded for this head SHA. - Scope: The modification is minimal and focused: one session setting in one regression suite.
- Concurrency, lifecycle, locks: Not applicable; this is test setup only.
- Configuration/compatibility: No new config or protocol/storage compatibility change. It uses an existing session variable and existing rule name.
- Parallel code paths: No runtime path change. The disabled rule has its own set-operation coverage elsewhere; this suite remains scoped to PK-FK join behavior.
- Test coverage/results: No
.outupdate is needed because the expected shape/result file remains unchanged under the new setting; CI P0 regression passed. - Observability, transaction/persistence, data writes, FE-BE variable passing, performance: Not applicable to this test-only change.
- User focus: No additional user-provided review focus was present.
morrySnow
approved these changes
Jun 17, 2026
yiguolei
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
Release note
None
Check List (For Author)
Test
Behavior changed:
Does this need documentation?
Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)