reformat and realign function table - #7396
Conversation
|
No obvious timing issues in HEAD=jumpTableCastRemoval Generated via commit 7aa8ab6 Download link for the artifact containing the test results: ↓ atime-results.zip
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7396 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.01% 99.01%
=======================================
Files 88 88
Lines 17293 17296 +3
=======================================
+ Hits 17123 17126 +3
Misses 170 170 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
| { "Ctest_dt_win_snprintf", (DL_FUNC)&test_dt_win_snprintf, -1 }, | ||
| { "Cdt_zlib_version", (DL_FUNC)&dt_zlib_version, -1 }, | ||
| { "Cdt_has_zlib", (DL_FUNC)&dt_has_zlib, -1 }, | ||
| { "Csubstitute_call_arg_namesR", (DL_FUNC)&substitute_call_arg_namesR, -1 }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks nice now, but if ever a new routine is added that is longer than Csubstitute_call_arg_namesR, it will induce a very large diff touching all of these lines.
So to complete this PR I would:
- put
static const **on the first line - indent the array contents by 2 spaces
And remove extra whitespace.
There are a few packages doing { "..." instead of {"...", but it's the minority. Personally I prefer {"...".

Ignore the fork name.
Just reformatting to make it more readable.