Skip to content

[DISCUSSION] Clarify public ExecutionPlan transformation contracts for optimizer-added state #23105

Description

@haohuaijin

So I suggest we discuss separately what extra contract you need for downstream usage, and then extend swap_inputs() accordingly. (and also add the above assertions to prevent similar issues)

Originally posted by @2010YOUY01 in #23078 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions